View Single Post
Old
10-26-2003, 01:16 PM
  #6
neelynugs
Registered User
 
neelynugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vote Quimby!
Posts: 29,896
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pucks
Raycroft is eligable for the Calder by a hair. Jillson is not.

To be eligable you can not have acheived your 26th birthday by Sept 15th of the season in question, can not have played more than 25 games in any one NHL season, and can not have played in 6 or more games in any 2 NHL seasons.
we have conflicting reports on raycroft's eligibility. kirk has stated that raycroft ISN'T eligible. over the past three seasons, he's played in:
15 games, 1 game, 5 games...by the definition above, he WOULD be a rookie. anyone...anyone? bueller??

neelynugs is offline