View Single Post
10-05-2011, 09:42 PM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 3,554
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by NYR Boyler87 View Post
If Wolski is going to play on the 3rd line (which I agree with BTW) than I hope Sather looks to move him for a better suited player for that line moving forward. They need a physical presence on that line.

I am fine with:



Someone in the Chris Kelly/Blake Wheeler mold would be perfect (not saying either of those players are available).
Why would they trade Wolski for a "physical presence" when they could have kept Avery for half the cap hit?

Wolski was kept here to provide offense.

If they trade him for a physical presence it will make the Avery move look even stupider.

ruckus* is offline   Reply With Quote