Palushaj called up
View Single Post
10-10-2011, 05:37 PM
Join Date: Nov 2006
I am not sure I agree with the "top three lines or nothing" sentiment. Palushaj can play effectively on the 4th line, he has done it here before.
Originally Posted by
I would have preferred Blunden if they are in fact placing Palushaj on the 4th line. However, if they are targeting someone to play in top 6/9...then Palushaj is the obvious bet.
However, knowing Martin...he will form a 4th line of Palushaj/Enqvsit/Weber...
What has Blunden done to prove he is any better than Palushaj? Blunden was essentially invisible during preseason, and I would be willing to bet that 95% of this board has never even seen him play a regular season game.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by guest1467