Palushaj called up
View Single Post
10-10-2011, 06:50 PM
Join Date: Apr 2007
Originally Posted by
I am not sure I agree with the "top three lines or nothing" sentiment. Palushaj can play effectively on the 4th line, he has done it here before.
What has Blunden done to prove he is any better than Palushaj? Blunden was essentially invisible during preseason, and I would be willing to bet that 95% of this board has never even seen him play a regular season game.
I am saying if they play Palushaj on the 4th line, he will be ineffective. He won't be playing with offensive players, so what will be be providing on the 4th line? He doesn't have any size, grit or toughness to warrant being played on the 4th line.
All I am saying, is that Blunden is better suited for the 4th line in my view.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Gainey#1*