Why not Chris Clark?
View Single Post
10-10-2011, 07:00 PM
Join Date: Mar 2011
Originally Posted by
Take it easy pal. The Dogs could use the experience. And that's why you sign him to a short term contract or did your intelligent eyes not pick that up?
No need to be sarcastic. I'm sorry if I offended you, pal. Fact is we don't need a player like him and neither do the Dogs. It would just be a waste of a contract in my opinion. We should only sign players when it's necessary, not when there is a possibility of a player being somewhat useful to the team when we don't really need them.
Excellent post by "Commandant" under me clarifying what I have been trying to explain. We only have two more contracts until the limit, why in the world would we make a pointless signing such as this one and "send him down if it doesn't work out" as you said? Makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Last edited by JohnLennon: 10-10-2011 at
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JohnLennon