View Single Post
10-12-2011, 10:20 AM
DDs not undersized
Former Partisan duCH
DDs not undersized's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bangkok
Country: Thailand
Posts: 3,405
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by habsjunkie2 View Post
I never said that they don't have a right to be offended or upset. All I'm saying is legal action is a joke. You don't like what was said and disagree with how he represented you, fine, deal with it with him or not, I don't really care. I don't really care that these guys may have had their feelings hurt, their supposed to be grown men for christ sakes.

If Don is forced to retire over this then they are equally or more guilty than him imo. Anyways, I agree that Cherry was a bit obnoxious and over the top, but disagree that legal action is appropriate. Not to mention, I don't think they would win a defamation case to begin with. A defamation case is very difficult to win. They sound like a bunch of babies.
See Jeff Fillion.

The only way to remove trash talkers from the air is to sue them. Don't kid yourself : the only reason why the CBC gives a tribune like that to Cherry is because he brings money in the house. The day he'll start costing more than he brings, he'll be fired.

DDs not undersized is offline   Reply With Quote