View Single Post
10-28-2003, 02:01 PM
Registered User
JCProdigy's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: I want what I want
Posts: 1,232
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by #37-#93-#27
That may be true but 50 spots is a pretty big difference when compared to players you're supposed to match up favorably or equally.
Yes and no. For example, if you asked these same evaluators to rank this same prospect pool a year ago then you'd proabably see a 100 spot difference between a guy like Jessiman and Parise. So in essence you can say that Jessiman gained 50 spots on Parise in one year. Maybe by the time they reach the NHL Hugh will have surpassed Zach, maybe not, thus the futility issue.

JCProdigy is offline