View Single Post
Old
10-26-2011, 03:12 PM
  #185
bernmeister
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,704
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RGY View Post
YAWN. Yeah we'll give you credit WHEN and IF you're trade proposals actually ever come close to becoming reality or true.

It's great to know you're 100% correct (in fact more than that if mathematically possible as you claim) after a rangers loss to edmonton. But after two wins there's no way your thinking is wrong. In fact this team would essentially have to have gone 82-0 this year scoring at least 3 goals per game for trade proposals not to be present.

Knit-picking is annoying.
Bold: Addressed in my last post. The premise behind the proposal was true, the need to increase offense, if necessary at cost of defense is true.

Underline: establishes the bold.

"But after two wins there's no way your thinking is wrong."
Don't see ; in any event, the fundamental flaws of this team are as I said, and will be so whether we go 2, 12, or whatever number of wins or games into the season until same is adrressed.

Balance:
"In fact this team would essentially have to have gone 82-0 this year scoring at least 3 goals per game for trade proposals not to be present."

bernmeister is online now