Should it have been Briere, and why not?
View Single Post
10-28-2011, 04:40 PM
Join Date: Jun 2010
Originally Posted by
I though thought Briere was the #1 reason when we went to the conference finals against Pittsburgh
. But I didn't think he was the number 1 reason that we went to the finals against Chicago, that was Richards and Giroux (and they both outscored Briere up until the finals, didn't they).
Though in the finals, Briere was the biggest reason that we came as close as we did.
I must be missing something here. You just made two really great points for a counter-argument.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by alx83*