View Single Post
11-11-2011, 03:39 PM
Big Phil
Registered User
Big Phil's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 25,282
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by TheDevilMadeMe View Post
For all the talk of Jagr's longevity advantage over Lafleur:

Lafleur = 6 X 1st Team All Star; 0 X 2nd Team All-Star
Jagr = 7 X 1st Team All Star; 1 X 2nd Team All-Star

Jagr didn't have that many more elite seasons than Lafleur.
But you have to look at it deeper. Jagr had a 94 and 99 point season prior to his Art Ross run. Neither year he was an all-star but in 1994 with his 99 point year it wouldn't have been criminal.

Then even in 2001-'02 when we thought Jagr was on a slow decline after 4 straight scoring titles he was still 5th in points.

2007 he has a 96 point year, still among the elite. No all-star because Heatley and St. Louis were (barely) the better players that year. Still good in 2008 too. Still good in 2011 by the looks of it. Lafleur has the 6 years and very little else. Jagr doesn't, and his two Cup wins were as a rookie so he's fairly evenly spread out

Big Phil is offline   Reply With Quote