View Single Post
Old
11-14-2011, 08:51 PM
  #27
Tawnos
A guy with a bass
 
Tawnos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 11,989
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerEsq View Post
I'll save this and repeat it back to both of you when the Rangers have more than $7 in cap space available under the new deal, assuming we don't re-sign any of our UFAs or MZA.
Well, 50% of HRR based on last year's info would be $56.3m Cap per team. So let's say NHL revenues bump to $3.5B and the new standard is immediately set at 50%. The Cap would be set at $58.3m. The Rangers currently have $47m on the CURRENT roster allocated for next season. They have 8 forwards signed, 4 defensemen and 1 goalie. Without a rollback, they're only working with $11.3m to bring in at least 7 roster players. Add Parise at $7m and you're talking about $4.3m for 6 roster players. Impossible.

And this is why the situation is unworkable. Either the NHLPA agrees to the immediate rollbacks or the NHL agrees to a gradual reduction in cap. Keep in mind that keeping the Cap stagnant until revenue catches up means that, on a $3.5B revenue stream, the current Cap represents 55% in player salaries.


Last edited by Tawnos: 11-14-2011 at 08:56 PM. Reason: correction on salary commitments
Tawnos is offline   Reply With Quote