View Single Post
11-18-2011, 03:28 PM
joshjull's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamburg,NY
Country: United States
Posts: 35,924
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ryan Ellis Problems View Post
Vanek is performing at a level far above his peers. Miller is not. Both of them must do so to justify their salaries.
I'm not talking about this year and I appologize for such a poorly stated OP.

I'm saying that many expect Miller at times to be a rock that helps the team ride through storms in a game. Some even expect him to carry the team when they're struggling. They base this in large part of his current deal.

My question is why isn't there the same expectation of Vanek who is paid even more?

Are the expectations on Miller more positionally based? Or are the pay based? Or a combo of both?

joshjull is online now   Reply With Quote