View Single Post
11-24-2011, 12:04 AM
Registered User
greech's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston
Country: United States
Posts: 361
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to greech
Originally Posted by dereksutton9 View Post
The one thing that's always bugged me in the receiving of a "free education" is really the quality of education received. Unless you go to some of the bigger named universities like Michigan, Wisconsin, BC, etc., having a degree from most of the better NCAA hockey programs doesn't really mean much. Go to your corporate HR rep and ask what a Quinnipac degree can do for you.

This doesn't even take into account getting a degree in basket weaving or athletic taping strategies as majors.

The CHL is your best shot at making hockey a career. The NCAA is the more conservative attempt at the same thing.
Uhh. Not sure if serious. There's some very good educations being given out by hockey playing schools. I'd think the onus would be on the individual players to get the most out of their free educations, not to call out the quality of schools.

greech is offline   Reply With Quote