Thread: Recalled/Assigned: Omark to Barons - All Omark Discussion Here
View Single Post
Old
12-07-2011, 01:08 AM
  #853
Horseradish
Registered User
 
Horseradish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON
Posts: 4,186
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by joestevens29 View Post
So you suggest we stop giving a kid that has taken all his chances and has grown with them?

Or you are suggesting that we start giving away our top rw's time who is a UFA and is going to wonder why some kid who wasn't producing is more important to this team than he is?
Or neither.

Omark would be a hell of a lot more useful on the PP than either Belanger or Jones.

And playing him ES at shotgun with Horc and Smyth wouldn't be so bad either. Or even with Paajarvi.

Would 3 ES scoring lines be such a bad idea?

Hall-RNH-Eberle
Smyth Horc Hemsky
Paajarvi Gagner Omark

It's about asset management in a rebuild. If they trade him now, he won't get a return worth a 0.5 PPG producer as he was last year. If they keep hin buried in the minors, they lose him to Sweden for nothing. If they give him a bit of time to produce again, his value becomes much greater, and they either find a spot for him or they trade him for a piece that would be valuable in our rebuild.

Horseradish is offline   Reply With Quote