Quote:
|
Originally Posted by True Blue
The sad thing is that I agree with you. I do not think that the lines that I posted above will happen. But, on the other hand, I simply do not see how Jackass can justify playing Hlavac ahead of Moore. I know that the desire is to keep the Simon-Mess-Matty line together, but a line HAS to be created for Lindros. I think that Lundmark will play with Eric once he gets back into the lineup. And again, say Lindros returns either Tuesday or Thursday, I just do not see how Jackass can justify NOT having Moore in the lineup. To me, eiter Hlavac or Lacouture has to be the odd-man out. I think that Rosie has shown more on Holik's wing than on Eric's. That line of Rucinsky-Holik-Carter is going pretty well. So that is one set line. You know that the other line is going to have Nedved with Kovalev and Messier will center a line with Barnaby. So if you start with this precept:
-Nedved-Kovalev
-Lindros-Lundmark
Rosie-Holik-Carter
-Mess-Matty
Now it's just a matter of filling in the blanks. To me it's a matter of one or 2 views, and in both of the Moore is in the lineup.
Moore-Nedved-Kovalev
Simon-Lindros-Lundmark
Rosie-Holik-Carter
Lacoutre/Hlavac-Messier-Matty (my choice would be Lacoutre)
OR the other thought is this:
Hlavac-Nedved-Kovalev
Moore-Lindros-Lundmark
Rosie-Holik-Carter
Simon-Messier-Matty (here the odd-man out is Lacoutre)
Again, I just do not see how Jackass can ignore the good play of Moore. That and the fact that Bouch MUST be back as one of the top 6 d-men.
|
I like your 2nd lines better. Mainly because id like to keep the messier line in tact, and i want to keep Moore with Lundmark.