View Single Post
12-13-2011, 10:31 AM
Registered User
mnwildgophers's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,497
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Jarick View Post
Another terrible stats article

My response:

And I'm done with these jokers.
I like how he makes these claims, then says well I should try to correlate it to Corsi and Fenwick, but I'm not going to. Sure it's interesting to look at, but like you said it's not a correlation with winning percentage which in fact is the only thing that matters. Besides, he's got decimals in there and said there can be errors in calculating this, so how do we know that the numbers are accurate? It's possible that the numbers simply aren't correct. I get the point he's trying to make, but he doesn't have nearly enough evidence backing up what he's saying.

Also, where does he get this Ozone% crap from? How is he calculating that? My god, these stat articles are really getting ridiculous.

mnwildgophers is offline