View Single Post
Old
12-16-2011, 09:42 PM
  #35
piqued
Registered User
 
piqued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas
Country: United States
Posts: 28,521
vCash: 3722
I don't understand how Goligoski doesn't play most or all of these PP sets. He is literally our only decent option (not counting Larsen since Gulutzan evidently seems to think he's a defensive defenseman).

This is Gulutzan's responsibility. He remains steadfastly committed to configurations that simply do not and will not work. He clearly understands that there's a need to improve the play at the points, as evidenced by his bizarre Petersen experiment. So what gives?

piqued is offline   Reply With Quote