View Single Post
12-27-2011, 04:09 PM
Draft Guru
Registered User
Draft Guru's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 6,913
vCash: 920
Originally Posted by Dubkov21 View Post
The same coach who two games ago said of the Hags-Rich-Cally-line: "They were nothing special" and then switched back to playing Dubi on Richards' LW (though admitedly changed back after just one period)?

Give the posters on this board a little credit. They are looking for ways to get our $50M UFA center going. It's obvious that he's missing a scoring winger, and some of us think that might be Wolski. Hags can still produce on a line with Dubi and Boyle.

Hags is awesome, but Wolski has more skill, more creativity and a better shot. If he get's going (big if, I know), he can be a very important contributor to this team.

I have no problem with people wanting Hags to stay on the 2nd line, there are reasonable arguments for keeping him there, but don't lable those who disagree as "less smart".There are sound arguments both ways. Some would say "don't change what's working", others would say: "You need to look for things to improve even when you're doing well."
One of the best posts I have seen on these forums in a long time.

Draft Guru is online now   Reply With Quote