View Single Post
01-03-2012, 04:22 PM
Registered User
Svenhart2008's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 589
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Dantes19 View Post
It's a waste of time, that's the problem. If he doesn't know anything about the sport, he shouldn't be interviewing one of its marquee players. He had a great opportunity to talk to a guy like Lundquist, and he asked ******** questions that were uninteresting and overly vague

I'd rather have no hockey coverage from Francessa than have to listen to him **** around like this. Like another poster said, let one of the WFAN guys that knows something about hockey handle this type of interview.
I thought the questions where Hank took us through the penalty shot and explained some things about it was very interesting.

Before you go and tell me that it wasn't interesting or my expectations are low. Don't bother going there, i liked it. My opinion. You have yours, no problem at all.

Svenhart2008 is offline   Reply With Quote