View Single Post
Old
12-17-2005, 06:25 PM
  #5
willie
Registered User
 
willie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: United Nations
Posts: 3,977
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by no name
I think Vancouver would be silly not to trade him. He wont be signed and simply is not performing. He has value so why not bring in a young player to replace him.
He is signed for another year too. And while they might trade him this season, rest assured it wont be to the Kings, as they are - don't laugh - a potential rival in the post-season. And I can only really see them dealing him if they are getting back a bonafide #1 goalie who is a quasi-long term solution to their goaltending woes.

If he is coming to the Kings, I can't see it happening until the off-season.

willie is offline