View Single Post
01-04-2012, 04:19 PM
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 29,773
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by egelband View Post
because you could maximize two assets instead of stretching one and losing the other. this is the thinking. whether it's correct or not, remains to be seen. but i - for one - believe in giving wolski a shot with richards. if he does play to his potential (remember, he's just 25 and has four 40-plus point seasons under his belt) you could theoretically have two very good scoring lines and possibly the best third line i've ever seen on the rangers. (along with a nice tough checking fourth line). very nice's not guaranteed, but worth a month's shot.
At the same time, you mess with chemistry.

SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote