And the dirtiest team in the league is.....
View Single Post
01-07-2012, 10:37 PM
Join Date: Aug 2003
Originally Posted by
By good dirty, I meant effective. It leads to victories. Good didn't mean because they injure people, though I'm not sure what people are talking about in terms of injuries.
Vancouver's brand just pisses the whole league off.
So Vancouver's "bad dirty" is bad because it angers people, and isn't effective, ie. it doesn't lead to victories? Is this your point?
Meaning that the Bruins' "good dirty" does not, in fact, piss off other teams (manifestly false), and that the Canucks brand of hockey doesn't produce wins (manifestly false).
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ziploc