View Single Post
Old
01-08-2012, 02:43 PM
  #67
DrinkFightFlyers
Grave Before Shave
 
DrinkFightFlyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 13,311
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to DrinkFightFlyers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
JVR/Voracek/Couturier/Schenn + 2nd/3rd (which I would be against)

or Simmonds + 1st (which I might be okay with if we didn't need to draft defense)

or Read + high 1st (which we don't have)

or 1st + Read + Cousins (which would make me happy, but ANA wouldn't do it)
Fair enough.

Quote:
Gleason and Grossman don't solve our long-term problems. We have a long-term problem at defense to begin with and then you trade away one of the two or three only long-term solutions we do actually have in our possession at the moment by moving Coburn.

It's a terrible idea.
Grossman and Gleason are both UFAs. Opens up the door to go after Weber or Suter in the offseason.

Quote:
I would not do Ryan + Gleason + Grossman for Schenn and Coburn.

Schenn is stellar and Coburn is far too vital to our future. That's why he got extended.
Fair enough.

Quote:
It's pretty bad dude.
It's not that bad. Timonen and Mez is a good top pairing. Carle-Gleason is probably an average second pairing. Grossman-MAB/Gus is better than Parent-Karjicek from 2010.

DrinkFightFlyers is offline   Reply With Quote