View Single Post
Old
01-22-2012, 03:47 PM
  #45
Koto
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,290
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7ark View Post
I am pleased with these changes. Teubert had good and bad moments but more seasoning in the A on a winning team won't hurt him at all. Chorney is also a better puck mover. Oh and I take back everything I said about O'Marra being able to replace what Lander brings for 6 minutes a game. O'Marra can't handle 6 minutes a game. The less said about Green the better, and I'm still unsure why we sent Petrell down in the first place.

How I would do the lineup for next game

Hall - Gagner - Eberle
Hartikainen - Lander - Paajarvi
Smyth - Horcoff - Hemsky
Petrell - Belanger - Eager

Whitney - Petry
Potter - Smid
Chorney - Sutton

Khabby(it's showcasing time)
Your lines looks decent, but it would be a miracle of Lander played ahead of either Horcoff or Belanger, both will never happen.

In terms of your D, theres no way whitney is playing ahead of Smid right away. Keep Smid+Petry as the "1st" pair.

Also i dont know why everyone is hating on Peckham still, he played terrible at the beginning of the year, but recently has been an OK 3rd pairing guy. I don't know what leads you to believe Chorney will be better.

Smid-Petry
Sutton-Potter
Whitney-Peckham

2/3 pairing are a toss up, ice time is up for grabs to who plays better.

Koto is offline   Reply With Quote