View Single Post
01-22-2012, 07:37 PM
Registered User
Dreakmur's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orillia, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,481
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by TheDevilMadeMe View Post
I just don't see it as being much better than the original trade, but I guess "just a tiny bit better" is sometimes good enough to push things from unacceptable to acceptable.
If that is the resulting trade, I feel the trade committee has done it's job in this case. All trades have a winner and loser, but as long as we can eliminate the trades that distort the balance of the draft, I think that's what we should focus on.

I think the changes made, assuming they are agreed upon by the GMs involved, are enough as well.

(having said that, if we can get them to remove the 151 and 134 part, it would be more fair)

Dreakmur is offline   Reply With Quote