View Single Post
Old
01-02-2006, 11:31 PM
  #57
High Flyer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philly
Country: United States
Posts: 62
vCash: 500
[QUOTE=RUS]Your TO comparison is just insane. How is it relevant???? QUOTE]

How is it relevant? bringing in someone who cud potentially break up the chemistry in the locker room and cause a set back is extremely relevant...n u can't say tha hasn't happened in the past wit the flyers...it happened wit lindros who was already on the team...iv learned over the years tha most team sports are similar at least when it comes to team building and chemistry so i thought the trans-sport comparison was relevant.

i don't doubt tkachuk as a offense booster...buh does his production out way the possible negative effects esp if he stays on this trend n has an injury plagued season? IMO no

u say the forsberg line is ineffective...ok ill give u tha for the last few weeks...buh now tha the other lines are starting to pick up the slack...teams will have to pay more attention to them as well...granted the forsberg line will always get the brunt of it

also, u say the pp sucks...ok tru...buh remember the 2 powerplay QBs are out rite now in pitkanen n rico...and even hitch himself admits tha is the problem rite now

defense may not score goals but it helps prevent the team from giving up leads and allows a team to be confident in their own zone...which allows them to push the offensive zone more

u also have to remember who the coach is n his style of play...hitch will never want a player who does not respect both ends of the ice...tkachuk has 7 even-strength pts in 10 gms thus far but he is also -3 in +/- during tha span

High Flyer is offline