View Single Post
Old
11-08-2003, 01:45 PM
  #37
Sammy*
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,501
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watts02
Ah you make my point for me, Lindros was a great player for a few years but you can agree with me that he live dup to no where near his potential. What if the Nordiques would have made him play or sit him. How many cups would Philly won and not colorado. He was made out to be more important then either team, the only winners from that is the avalanche. In most peoples opinions Lindros is a baby just like commrie, and will never and should never be mentioned in the same sentance as the greats of this game.

Oh and No trust me you wouldnt want commrie on your team, he does not play any defense, nor helps out at all on the back end. He will always have a very poor +- rating. and not on the + side. He is a defensive liability and wouldnt work in your system. He wines too much for lou anyways.
God almighty, given you are from Edmonton, one thinks you would have a clue.
Alas,you do not.

Comrie:
00/01 41 gms, +6 (equates to +12)
01/02 82 gms +16
02/03 69 gms -18

So he is a plus for his career & the year he was bad he had an injury for the most part.

Sammy* is offline