View Single Post
Old
01-28-2012, 04:00 PM
  #14
ManCrush on Tazer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarava View Post
It has nothing to do with spending money. Not sure where you got that... I didn't say that.

What I am saying is what Stan said last summer. This team is soft and too easy to play against.

After the cup win, Stan chose to trade away any and all physical elements of the Hawks top 9. Bye bye byfuglien and Ladd. Hello soft Blackhawks!

Signing Mayers and Carcillo was a small step in the right direction. But that doesnt help the to 9 - who play the majority of the minutes.

This is the primary reason I'm not against trading Kaner. Not because he is slumping - he will get past that. But because he has a high salary, is our softest player and could bring back that elusive skilled power forward that is otherwise out of the Hawks reach in a trade. Those guys have major value, but so does Kane - so they could pull it off.
You started your previous post by saying "Stanley cup>Cap responsibility". That's EXACTLY where he got the "spending money" part from because that's EXACTLY what your saying...

ManCrush on Tazer is offline   Reply With Quote