View Single Post
Old
01-31-2012, 09:43 PM
  #58
MoreOrr
B4
 
MoreOrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mexico
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,330
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CpatainCanuck View Post
Perhaps if Vancouver had nearly twice its population (like Montreal has) or more than twice its population had (like Toronto has) it would have been able to sell the 3,000-4,000 more seats a game required to sell out during its worst era.
I'm just going to say this only because your post seems like a perfect example for a thread that's on the Main Board:
Contradictions regarding popular HF Board arguments
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh....php?t=1093999

We regularly read around here that the smaller size of Canadian cities doesn't mean much because Canadians truly support hockey, so places like Winnipeg, Quebec City, hell even Saskatoon, are declared big enough to support the NHL without a problem. But here we have CpatainCanuck using the opposite argument, saying that Vancouver could've supported better the Canucks in it worst era if only the population of the city were greater.

Sorry man, I just had to say it.


Last edited by MoreOrr: 01-31-2012 at 10:07 PM. Reason: minor typo
MoreOrr is offline