View Single Post
Old
02-09-2012, 10:12 AM
  #23
Gardner McKay
Moderator
Hey Hey...
 
Gardner McKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta
Country: United States
Posts: 10,022
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYRFAN218 View Post
As BRB said, I don't want the game micro managed to the point where we're reviewing everything. The problem with expanding review is the quality of the officiating declines since they know they have review to ensure the right call will be made. Just look at the NFL and some of the ****** calls officials make now. Why get the call right when the coach could just challenge it and fix it then?
No one is arguing for reviewing everything. Just everything relating to a goal. I can't see how anything is wrong with that. Every other goal related issue is reviewable.

If a puck that is batted down into the net is deemed to be a high stick by the official and resulting in a non goal, that is reviewable.

Why can't the same apply to the interference? Penalty or not the wrong call is being made and therefore because it is related to a goal it should be a REVIEWABLE call.

People worrying about micro managing are worrying way to much. Until they start making penalties not related to a goal reviewable you have nothing to worry about.

Gardner McKay is online now   Reply With Quote