View Single Post
02-09-2012, 02:44 PM
Registered User
BM67's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In "The System"
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,634
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by TheDevilMadeMe View Post
If the goal is to establish a level of consistency, shouldn't the unique circumstances of 2006 be taken into account?
Originally Posted by seventieslord View Post
as well as other years like 1989 and 1996? Yes, absolutely. But this is where BM67 and I don't agree. We both like the vs. #2 system but he works for it and I want it to work for me!
What is consistent about a system that can go from using #2 to #3-4-5-7 in any given year?

Did you miss the part where I also posted the vs#3 numbers? Does this not "fix" 2006 while still being balanced for the period? Using the #2 in every year except 2006, but using the #4 for 2006, you just end up with an orange to compare to your apples.

Alfredsson's score in 05-06 is his 3rd best vs#2, but jumps to his highest using vs#3 or vs#4, so I'm sure what you're going to "fix" anyway.

I see shortening the period from 5 to 3 or 4 years, so you have more periods not including 2006, as a better alternative.

Iginla had more points in 8 of the last 12 seasons, but Alfredsson had 3 straight years with more points from 2002-03 to 2005-06. The 3 years after Iginla's best season.

Last edited by BM67: 02-09-2012 at 02:50 PM.
BM67 is offline