View Single Post
Old
02-09-2012, 04:53 PM
  #163
seventieslord
Registered User
 
seventieslord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,328
vCash: 500
I'm not so sure I care what they did in consecutive seasons. If two guys had identical finishes and percentages in their 5 best years I don't think it would matter to me that one guy did it consecutively (Yzerman?) and the other did it in a more Sakician fashion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BM67 View Post
What is consistent about a system that can go from using #2 to #3-4-5-7 in any given year?
the goal is to be consistent and compare players to a fairly static standard of dominance. at least that is my goal. You use #2 and the reason is because #1 is too often highly variable. But so is #2!

------------------------

By the way, TDMM, can you admit something? These four RWs are closer than you probably thought yesterday.

seventieslord is offline