View Single Post
Old
02-13-2012, 12:45 AM
  #41
timekeep
Registered User
 
timekeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,316
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldCub View Post
I keep reading comments of a better way for the WHL to conduct it's draft. I hear many reasons but really wonder about the motives of those making these comments. Did your kid get overloooked, did the scouts slight your team, are the scouts rating kids differently than you would, did some undrafted kids make it, what could it be that outsiders are telling the insiders how to run their business. SO WHAT IF MISTAKES ARE MADE, who cares. If no mistakes were made then the kids could just pack it in after their draft as the die would be cast. The WHL teams should be left to run THEIR business as they see fit.
The only advantage for the WHL with this draft age group is that the teams can lock up players a year earlier and eliminating their NCAA status if a kid plays or signs with a team. Why wouldn't a team want to know more about a kid a year older and have him play immediately if good enough?

timekeep is offline