View Single Post
02-14-2012, 08:08 PM
Join Date: Apr 2007
I called it "pretend" to point out how unreliable it is, as a principle, and then I explained why it doesn't make sense practically either, using both sports psychology and a little Heideggerian phenomenology.
For a guy who claims to be a stat bunny, you're sure into the subjective, which truly is the realm of someone who is not interested in defending a point logically.
My point still remains: Your criterion is awful and the entire point behind it is that you believe it is a better way of evaluating a players by breaking down your subjective evaluation of what is reasonable vs unreasonable so you can give your blessing to goaltenders.
It isn't reasonable and I gave you a lengthy explanation as to why not.
Last edited by Beef Invictus: 02-15-2012 at
. Reason: Cleanup
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Flyotes