View Single Post
Old
02-15-2012, 05:11 PM
  #120
Zrinski
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 815
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueForever View Post
I say neither, because I would get both.

Listen if we can get Carter and Nash without giving up Phaneuf, Gunnerson, Liles, Gardiner, Lupol, Kessel, Bozak, Frattin, Kulemin, Grabovski, Steckle, Brown, Crabb, Reimer and Gustofsson. Do it.

Why not the following:

Schenn, Komisarek, Schrivens, Kadri and 2nd

for

Nash, Huselius

Colbourne, McCarther, and a 3rd

for

Carter

Lineup

Lupol- Carter - Kessel
Nash - Grabovski - Connolly
Kulemin - Bozak - Frattin
Brown - Steckle -Crabb

Phaneuff - Aulie
Gunnerson - Liles
Gardiner - Holzner

Reimer
Gustufsson
Why would any of the bolded be untouchable in a deal for Nash? Frattin and Kulemin play somewhat similar game's to Nash but are no where near his level and neither ever will be. The other guys... no sense at all taking those players off the table when you're talking about a guy like Nash. Only left Bozak unbolded due to his value to us as a team weak at center.

Nash would cost a lot (at least 2-3 of the guys on your list I left unbolded). I think Carter is a far smarter trade option for us.

Zrinski is offline   Reply With Quote