"Aww, that's Nash-ty." Nash Rumors Part V: McKenzie says down to Rangers/Sharks
View Single Post
02-22-2012, 02:53 PM
Join Date: Jan 2009
Originally Posted by
Why do people keep bringing this up? WW has nothing to do with anything. He's done as a Ranger as soon as his contract is up...if not sooner. His space can be used for any player. It doesn't have to be spent on Nash. And personally I'd rather just use it on a 5M player who scores 25-30 goals every year who will cost far less in assets and provide for greater cap flexibility. We don't need another overpriced superstar. They are almost never worth their cost anyway.
I've noticed a lot of people bringing that up as well. I'm not sure if they are playing dumb, are under the mentality that Nash is a rental with an expiring contract, or are just plain clueless. Fitting in Nash isn't an issue for this season. It's down the road when our RFAs are due for raises when it becomes a concern.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by OverTheCap