"Aww, that's Nash-ty." Nash Rumors Part V: McKenzie says down to Rangers/Sharks
View Single Post
02-23-2012, 12:11 PM
Join Date: Jul 2009
You guys have the pieces necessary to win a cup. You don't need Rick Nash. Couple reinforcements maybe, particularly on D (not too up-to-date on Sauer's condition and Staal's play.)
Sather should not be talking about Nash right now.
Now, say they fail to win the cup this season, maybe revisit the talks if Nash is still available. But even then, shouldn't be a priority.
Around this time 3 years ago, there were some people calling for the Bruins to acquire Lecavalier during their magical regular season. Bruins didn't win the cup that year, or even the next year, but they got one and they did it without Lecavalier's monster contract. I think this is the same type of situation.
It's hard to believe in a team when they haven't won anything yet, but the Rangers are for real. They shouldn't play it like a video game where you have to be loaded with stars to win the cup.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by nycbruins*