View Single Post
02-24-2012, 09:16 PM
Registered User
smoneil's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rochester
Country: United States
Posts: 2,291
vCash: 500
Gotta love the logic of the board.

Last time, the team loses in a shutout, scoring no PP goals. The response? "WE NEED GOALS AND PP SCORER! MUST HAVE NASH!"

Tonight, the team loses in a shootout with their backup goalie in the net. In said game, they score 3 goals, including two PP goals. The response? "WE SCORE GOALS? WE HAVE PP SCORERS? WE MUST HAVE NASH."

Y'all are STILL in love with the big name, and you just keep rotating your justifications to pretend that the team NEEDS Nash. Remember your Rangers history. This team is on the verge of bringing back the early 90s. I don't want to see them say "Naw. F that. Let's go right to the early aughts!"

smoneil is offline