Nash Rumors VII: This Could Get Nash-ty (IncarceratedBob is NOT a legitimate source)
View Single Post
02-24-2012, 09:21 PM
A guy with a bass
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by
Y'all are STILL in love with the big name, and you just keep rotating your justifications to pretend that the team NEEDS Nash. Remember your Rangers history. This team is on the verge of bringing back the early 90s. I don't want to see them say "Naw. F that. Let's go right to the early aughts!"
I get, and somewhat agree, with what you're getting at with this. But it does beg the question: how much of the team that actually won the Cup was homegrown?
Think of trading a seemingly stalled Dubinsky in the deal for Nash the same way you might think of trading a seemingly stalled Turcotte in the deal for Larmer
Honestly, if the Rangers don't get Nash, I'm fine. If they get him for Dubinsky, McIlrath, Thomas, 1st, I'm fine. If they get him for more than that, I'm pissed.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Tawnos