View Single Post
Old
11-12-2003, 08:40 PM
  #2
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 7,896
vCash: 500
Strangely enough, I voted no. Lindros is very important to the Rangers' success but, because of the way this group was assembled, it's almost impossible for Sather to come up with the right combination to make Lindros into an asset.

Without Lindros in the lineup, there is better balance, especially if Moore is the replacement and he continues to play with energy. But, without Lindros in the lineup, Messier is going to get too many minutes and Holik not enough (it happened tonight).

There probably should be a third choice: it doesn't matter. Cause, it probably doesn't, unless Sather suddenly gets smart and we all know how likely that is.

Brooklyn Ranger is offline