Grading Rangers "Trade Deadline" Moves (or lack there of)
View Single Post
02-27-2012, 04:55 PM
A guy with a bass
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by
Except that's not what this debate is. We're talking about getting upgrades somewhere and shedding assets to do so if necessary, which some people vehemently disagree with because we're the most chemistry-fueled team this side of chemistry, apparently.
Actually, I think Kel is the only person I've seen not acknowledging the need for an upgrade.
Personally, I didn't see the need for a top-6 upgrade, mostly because I thought it would cost too much. I wanted to see an offensive upgrade to our third line, but it turns out that none of those players were even available today.
Lundqvist is an important reason for this team's success, but chemistry is the biggest reason for the team being *as successful* as it's been this season. Without it, the team is not greater than the sum of it's parts and sits somewhere between 4 and 6, more likely at the 6. You should stop downplaying it.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Tawnos