View Single Post
03-02-2012, 12:52 AM
Registered User
mrhockey193195's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,335
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Edge View Post
All things being equal, I'm still not sure I take Parise over Nash (again all things being equal, and trade versus free agent signing being taken out of equation.

Put the same on the same team, same support system, I think Nash is the better player on most teams/in most systems.

With that said, I will agree that I think Parise would fit the Rangers a bit better.
Very interesting. You're the first person I've heard who's expressed that sentiment. For me, I'd take Parise 100 times out of 100, which is partially why I was so adamantly against trading for Nash.

Even if we disagree on which player we think is better, we definitely agree that Parise would fit the Rangers hand in glove. To me he is everything that the Rangers' identity is all about.

mrhockey193195 is offline