View Single Post
03-03-2012, 02:32 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 112
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by GeneralManager View Post
Yah, because the difference between 5 million and 4.75 million (which is just a number i threw out there) is the same as the difference between 3.75 and 4.75 million. I could have said 5 million and you would probably not have gone off on a tangent. If we did business together i'd probably make you go bankrupt while i swim in my money like scrooge mcduck but that's another story.

Price will be an RFA, not an UFA..those goalies averaging 6.25 million got those contracts as unrestricted free agents and that's a big difference. The habs can give price 2.75 million on a one year contract pending arbitration if they wanted to because they'd have no competition from a team to "one up them" unless there's an offer sheet. 4.75 million for an RFA goalie is pretty darn good for Carey, how many goalies that have yet to become unrestricted make more than that (jaro makes 3.75)? Giving price a 2 million a year raise on a contract where he isn't an ufa for 2 more seasons after a season where he essentially regressed is a good deal for everyone. Fair MARKET value (see halak) for Price is 3.75 million right now, we give Price 2 million above market for 2 years, so he stays with the team for a longer period and a piece of mind that he'll be making damn good NHL money for 8 more seasons. 6 million for 5 seasons < 4.75 for 8 seasons is more money in carey's pocket in the end while the team gets a better cap hit. From Prices perspective In those 3 years (between the 5 year and 8 year contract) Price's game might drop off, he can become injury prone, who knows? But he's pocketing 8 million dollars more in the end regardless of that.

This is how a successful general manager thinks and functions. And if we can circumvent the cap by giving Price a 12 year deal like kovalchuk or something, i'd be all for it. The point i'm making is to lockup a franchise goalie to the lowest cap hit as possible while capitalizing on the fact that he's an RFA, coming off a mediocre season and the market rate for goalies like him aren't making all that much money. I'm a forward thinker, if i see a player that i think highly of have a bad year...i'd do my best to capitalize on that poor season by extending him to a contract based on that performance knowing full well that he'll bounce back saving you millions in the end. Waiting for players to have a career season before you give them a new contract is one of the most stupid thing you can do as a general manager and so many of them make this mistake.
Why don't you stop ''throwing number'' and say the value you think Price would sign for ? Is it that hard ? It doesnt take 10 page to say that... or is it because you don't want to look like a fool in 4 month ??

We Agree that Price has franchise goalie potential ? He isnt there yet ... but he could become as good as the goalie you mentioned on that list right ?

Simple thing ... that I thought you would have realize a long time ago...

Why does all the Goalie you mentioned ... havent took a deal like the one you described ?? Cuz it's obviously not in their best interest...

Henrik Lundqvist as an Exemple.

Before signing is big contract, took a 1 years deal @ 4.250 millions.
Then sign 6 years @ 6.875 millions

I would'nt be surprise if Carey follow the same path. Signing a short term deal...take 1 season to prove he can get the job done... then sign the big contract.

For the last part ... thanks for pointing the obvious. That usually right there that his agent will say: Hello.

Have fun Mr.Manager !!!

ProMath is offline   Reply With Quote