View Single Post
Old
03-06-2012, 12:37 PM
  #26
BobRouse
Registered User
 
BobRouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,926
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NobodyBeatsTheWiz View Post
It was 100% a no-brainer.

And if Hamrlik were our best defensive defenseman, he'd be playing.

The GM turned down futures for the #7 defenseman who's on a bad over 35 contract.
Well in all fairness he can still trade him for futures in the offseason.

Didn't hurt to keep him around.

Now Wideman is a whole other story but I can see why they wanted to keep him if they intended to make a push. I'm sure Wideman could have brought in a 1st rounder so that would be the one for me seen as the biggest gamble.

BobRouse is offline   Reply With Quote