View Single Post
Old
03-07-2012, 12:17 PM
  #46
Monctonscout
Monctonscout
 
Monctonscout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,469
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller Time View Post
i don't think the issue is so much that the Habs let Pyatt/Pouliot go for nothing...

the issue is more so that they were replaced with arguably lesser players (one of which, Noke, we had to trade assets -however small- to obtain).


no where near as troublesome as the "big" blunders, such as trading for Kaberle, but yet another example that this management team does a piss-poor job at evaluating & managing the assets it has.


Pyatt & Pouliot are better assets to have on the NHL roster than Noke & Engqvist/Palushaj... cap hit about the same... So how do you reason that Gauthier did well by dropping the more talented/established players, while giving up a 7th rd pick & AHL prospect in the process?

bad asset management.
Pouliot's spot was taken by Desharnais and Cole coming in. The top 9 was supposed to be AK Eller DD Cole Pacioretty Gomez Plekanec Cammy and Gionta.

The 4th line was to have Darche White Moen on the wings, Pyatt is not an upgrade on any of those guys. Engqvist and Nokelainen are centers who replaced Halpern who wanted to play at home in Washington.

Monctonscout is offline   Reply With Quote