View Single Post
Old
03-08-2012, 12:03 AM
  #214
Damaged Goods
Registered User
 
Damaged Goods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,027
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by achdumeingute View Post
I don't see how. Again, you can say the rule doesn't do enough, but as it stands its pretty clear.

Here are a few 48.1 violation:
http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/con...d=60&id=148390
http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/con...d=60&id=131979
http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/con...d=60&id=125761

Here is a thread linking all suspensions this season:
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh...d.php?t=992217

These are night and day from the Kronwall hit.
Are they really? Explain how the Boyes hit is suspendable if the Kronwall hit is not. Both are clean hits save for the fact that they recklessly target the head of a defenseless player.

The NHL has already set precedent that lack of intent is not a good enough argument to get off the hook for Rule 48, even for players with no history.

http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/con...d=60&id=124715

Shanahan states that targeting the head could be considered "intentional OR reckless" and that the onus is on the player delivering the hit not to make contact with the head if the vulnerable recipient of the hit makes "no sudden movements." Colborne is turning up ice just like Voracek was. If this hit is punishable, I don't see how Kronwall's is not. I am just applying the NHL's stated criteria.

Damaged Goods is offline   Reply With Quote