Thread: OT: 2012 Union Season
View Single Post
Old
03-13-2012, 07:39 AM
  #25
GirouxGiroux
Visioneer
 
GirouxGiroux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Delaware
Country: United States
Posts: 2,557
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange is better View Post
Don't let anyone fool you. The ownership group doesn't really care about winning, as long as theyre getting their money. Don't be surprised if this team is back at square 1 this year.


The idea that the ownership are sitting back counting their money after two years is ridiculous. As is the "threat" that a third-year franchise might go allllll the way back to square one.

The Union played seven players last night who were 23 or younger. That didn't include four other U23 players who are on the roster that saw the field for them last year. These kids aren't here because the Union are cheap and don't care. It's because they're building something. No team has more players on the USA U23 team than the Union.

GirouxGiroux is offline   Reply With Quote