View Single Post
03-14-2012, 01:50 AM
Ambassador Of Fun
Registered User
Ambassador Of Fun's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,213
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Kritter471 View Post
No, the way the kneeing rule is written, the difference in major and minor is the "severity of infraction," or how egregiously a player stuck his knee out there, not how badly the player on the other end is hurt (though that certainly plays a subconscious role).

If the referee thinks the leg is out there as the guilty player is trying to make a legal hockey play that went awry (like in this case, Morrow's attempt to throw a bodycheck), then it's a trip or a kneeing minor. If he thinks the knee is out there cause the guy know he's going to get beat and does something illegal at the last minute to keep the guy from getting by him in a stupid, but not premeditated, reaction, it's a major plus a game misconduct. If it's a premeditated or really blatant attempt to injure, it's a match.

Morrow was attempting to make a hockey play and left his knee out in a dangerous location. Cullen saw him coming and tried to dance him (between him and Daley, IIRC), catching his leg on Morrow's knee on the way by rather than Morrow having the knee lined up on him all the way in. That's a classic kneeing or tripping minor.
"Severity of the infraction" doesn't necessarily mean severity that the offending player stuck out their knee. Since the Match penalty clarifies the intent part of the kneeing rule, I believe the Major/Minor clarification is discussing injury and not how much of an intent there was.

Last edited by Ambassador Of Fun: 03-14-2012 at 02:00 AM.
Ambassador Of Fun is offline   Reply With Quote