Thread: OT: 2012 Union Season
View Single Post
Old
03-15-2012, 05:40 PM
  #30
MountainHawk
Registered User
 
MountainHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salem, MA
Country: Vanuatu
Posts: 12,771
vCash: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange is better View Post
Yes I did know who Le Toux was 3 years ago when he was in Seattle.

And maybe Harvey wasn't our best defender, but he was a better option than a number of pieces they have now.

And you didn't answer my question. If they maintain that these moves ate to benefit the team, why trade a proven player who was far and away the heart and soul of the team to use a fraction of the money on players who are unproven in the league? How is that beneficial to anyone else but the owners?
Because he was gone after this season anyway, be the Union would not have been able to keep him under the cap, and this way they got something for him. I have no problem with this. The Union are crazy young, and if they develop anywhere like they should, they will be a top team in the East for 5-7 seasons.

MountainHawk is offline   Reply With Quote