Thread: Post-Game Talk: #70: Rangers vs. Pens
View Single Post
Old
03-15-2012, 09:02 PM
  #101
Janerixon
Registered User
 
Janerixon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,730
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by New York RKY View Post
I disagree wholeheartedly.

You're trying to tell me if some of those little tap in goals that the Rangers couldn't score on happened to Rick Nash they wouldn't be goals? Nash would have buried 1-2 if given the chances some of the Rangers were given.
^I agree, Nash buries at least one of those chances as opposed to Dubinsky who maybe created 1 for sure and possibly 2 scoring chances all night. I understand Sather did not want to part with Kreider or MDZ or MCD for Nash, but we really need secondary scoring badly. Nash on a second line plus a health Callahan changes everything. Hindsight is always 20-20, besides if we make that trade I guarantee Thomas and Miller turn into surefire 1st line NHl players and Erixon becomes a first pair d-man.

Janerixon is offline